If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Lehman Catastrophic Moment Invoked as EU Seeks Crisis Solution


“Cascading default, bank runs and catastrophic risk” lie ahead for the world economy unless Europe resolves its festering debt crisis, Timothy F. Geithner told global finance chiefs on the morning of Sept. 24.

The U.S. Treasury secretary spoke from experience and lessons learned. Three years ago, he was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and working to shore up a financial system in the chaos following the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) His warning last month at a meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Washington was the third in three weekends after he jetted to conferences in France and Poland to appeal directly to Europe’s policy makers for action.

After Lehman filed for bankruptcy on Sept. 15, 2008, financial institutions lost or wrote off almost $1 trillion; the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 40 percent in six months; and the world slumped into the deepest recession since World War II. The global economy still hasn’t recovered and has been close to stalling anew for the past several months.

Europe’s nightmare scenario would mean fresh financial disaster, according to Nobel laureate economist Robert Mundell. In the worst case, authorities fail to prevent Greece from defaulting on 356 billion euros ($489 billion) and investors react by triggering insolvencies as far as Spain and Italy. Such a firestorm would devastate bank balance sheets, rock markets, derail economic growth and threaten to splinter the 17-nation euro area. The European Central Bank would probably have to lead the response as the Fed did in 2008.

‘Scaring the World’

“Just before the Lehman crash, nobody expected anything like what happened afterwards,” said Mundell, whose research is credited with providing intellectual support for the euro, in a Bloomberg Television interview Oct. 6. “We’re right in the middle of crisis now. It’s not just a crisis of the sovereign debt, it’s a crisis of the banks, and this is now a global situation. It’s going to spread to the United States.”

Geithner’s comments last month were part of an apocalyptic chorus. Europe “is scaring the world,” President Barack Obama said Sept. 26. Bank of England Governor Mervyn King says the financial turmoil may be worse than the Great Depression. The crisis “has reached a systemic dimension,” said European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet on Oct. 11.

$13 Trillion Lost

The dire warnings reflect a mounting sense of urgency. Concern that difficulties in refinancing debt are spreading beyond the euro area’s smaller nations, and unease over the financial system’s exposure to sovereign bonds are shaking global markets. Europe’s woes are responsible for wiping out about $13 trillion of wealth since July 1, analysts at Barclays Capital estimate.

“It’s a horse race between the markets worried about the politics and the politicians who can fix things,” said William White, a former head of the monetary and economics department at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. “There’s a possibility that the markets win the race, and that would be truly horrible.”

White says policy makers outside Europe are concerned that if politicians fail to protect that continent’s economy and banks, investors would view other markets as the next dominoes to fall. The IMF estimates a U.S. budget deficit of about 10 percent of gross domestic product this year.

“At a global level, there’s a debt problem,” he said. “The U.S. can see they’re next in line.”

Crisis Conferences

European policy makers and those of the world’s 20 major advanced and emerging economies may have their last best chance of forestalling a meltdown in a series of meetings starting tonight in Paris, according to Jim O’Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

This weekend’s talks involve finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20. European leaders will then convene in Brussels on Oct. 23 and those from the G-20 will gather Nov. 3-4 in Cannes, France.

With markets fragile and Greece negotiating a second bailout, U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said G- 20 officials agreed at a Sept. 23 meeting that the Cannes summit would amount to a deadline for a plan because “patience is running out.”

“If the G-20 comes out of Cannes with nothing, that will be a nightmare,” said London-based O’Neill, who crafted the concept of the BRIC nations to describe the growing economic might of Brazil, Russia, India and China.

Central Bank’s Role

The ECB already needs “to be very active” in managing the regional crisis, said David Mackie, chief European economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. This will include allowing its bond buying program to reach as much as 1 trillion euros, maintaining liquidity in banks, and cutting its key interest rate to 1 percent from 1.5 percent by early next year, Mackie said. He forecasts an imminent recession.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy vowed Oct. 9 to devise a plan by the G-20 summit that would create a “durable solution.” Underscoring the urgency, a tightening of the interbank credit market forced Belgium and France last week to break up Dexia SA (DEXB), once the world’s biggest lender to municipalities.

“The failure of Greece would be the failure of all of Europe,” Sarkozy said Sept. 30 in Paris. “Remember in 2008, when the U.S. let Lehman Brothers fail, the global financial system paid the price. For both economic reasons and moral reasons, we can’t let Greece fail.”

Crisis Resolution Steps

To stop the crisis from spinning out of control, leaders are working on multiple fronts to manage Greece’s finances, protect banks and overhaul Europe’s economic governance to avoid a repeat. A default or a country leaving the euro weren’t part of the single currency’s original design.

The package of measures should include requiring banks to hold more capital so they can withstand potential losses from bond holdings, according to the IMF, which has put the cost as high as $200 billion. Euro-area banks need at least 150 billion euros of capital under a plan similar to the U.S. government’s U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program, estimate analysts at JPMorgan Cazenove led by Kian Abouhossein.

European governments also are laying plans to increase the spending power of a 440 billion euro bailout fund, created in May 2010 to provide loans to cash-strapped nations. It is now being revamped to allow it to also buy bonds on primary and secondary markets, offer precautionary credit lines and inject money into banks.

2 Trillion Euros

With taxpayers balking at providing more cash and wealthy countries worried about hurting their own credit ratings, officials may try to leverage the fund’s capacity, perhaps by insuring a portion of new bonds issued by debt-ridden nations. Silvio Peruzzo, an economist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in London, says 2 trillion euros of capacity is needed to persuade investors that Spain and Italy would have enough funding.

The need to make Greece’s borrowings more manageable also may mean investors will have to take a bigger share of losses on its debt than the 21 percent write-off that formed part of a July aid deal. German banks are preparing for losses of as much as 60 percent, said three people with knowledge of the matter.

Any fresh measures may still fail because of the range of differences over what to do, according to Mackie at JPMorgan Chase. The Germans and Dutch, for example, want a deeper restructuring of Greece’s debt than France and the ECB seem willing to accept, he says.

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Lehman Catastrophic Moment Invoked as EU Seeks Crisis Solution

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Trichet Sees ’Systemic Dimension’ to Crisis


European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet warned of threats to the financial system as the conflict among political leaders intensified over how to extricate Europe from the debt crisis.

“The crisis has reached a systemic dimension,” Trichet told European lawmakers in Brussels today. “Sovereign stress has moved from smaller economies to some of the larger countries. The crisis is systemic and must be tackled decisively.”


European officials are toiling to meet an end-of-month deadline set by French President Nicolas Sarkozy to get to grips with the crisis, which has propelled Greece to the brink of default, shaken world markets and fueled speculation that the 17-nation currency might not survive in its current form.

Slovak Vote

Today’s crisis-management efforts range from a vote in Slovakia on upgrading the 440 billion-euro ($600 billion) rescue fund to the release of a report by European and International Monetary Fund experts on Greece’s economic prospects. Risks to the region’s economic outlook have increased as governments struggle to contain the crisis, the European Commission said in a separate assessment published today.

After Malta’s endorsement late yesterday, the Slovak parliament stands as the only barrier to reinforcing the fund with the power to buy bonds in the primary and secondary markets, offer precautionary credit lines and enable the bolstering of bank capital.

Ratification Vote

Slovak Prime Minister Iveta Radicova sought to sideline opponents in her coalition by tying the EFSF ratification to a no-confidence motion. The Freedom of Solidarity party, one of the members of Radicova’s four-way coalition, said it won’t support the EFSF.

Nevertheless, Slovakia’s opposition Smer party will back the bailout revamp in a second vote if the first one fails, its leader, Robert Fico, told reporters in the capital Bratislava. There is no date set for a repeated vote.

Political jousting in Slovakia, which sat out Greece’s original 110 billion-euro aid program last year, showed how Europe’s unanimous decision-making principle makes the emergency response hostage to local politics.

‘Comprehensive’

In postponing a summit of euro leaders by five days yesterday to Oct. 23, European Union President Herman Van Rompuy sought extra time to pursue a “comprehensive” package including a solution for Greece, aid for banks and a further strengthening of the rescue fund.

The summit, now slated for a Sunday when the U.S. and European markets are closed, will be preceded by a finance ministers’ meeting on a date to be determined. Weekends are Europe’s traditional time for market-sensitive decisions, as when the euro area created the rescue fund in May 2010.

“There’s no obvious solution,” Luxembourg Finance Minister Luc Frieden told reporters in Luxembourg today. “There are several options that must be examined from the technical and political points of view.”

Greek bondholders may face writedowns of more than the 21 percent envisioned in a July rescue plan, Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker said, setting the stage for high- stakes bargaining at the leaders’ summit.

Juncker’s Comments

Asked by Austrian television last night whether Europe is considering writedowns of 50 percent to 60 percent, Juncker, who chairs euro-area finance meetings, said: “We’re talking about more.” A spokesman for Juncker, Guy Schuller, said today Juncker meant euro-area officials were discussing investor losses on their Greek holdings exceeding 21 percent. Both the ECB and banks oppose such a revision.

The ECB gave its blessing to one method of bolstering the fund, saying it could be used to insure a portion of new bonds sold by debt-strapped nations, automatically extending the fund’s coverage.

EFSF resources “should be dedicated to enhance sovereign debt new issuance of securities, thus multiplying their effect,” ECB Vice President Vitor Constancio said in Milan yesterday.

Officials are working out how to scale up the EFSF’s firepower without requiring another round of parliamentary approvals or dipping into the balance sheet of the ECB. The central bank has ruled out granting the EFSF a banking license.

For Greece, the endgame drew nearer with an announcement that EU, ECB and IMF experts are likely to complete their economic-review mission today.

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Trichet Sees ’Systemic Dimension’ to Crisis

Monday, October 10, 2011

Peter Joseph - When Normality Becomes Distortion

Peter Joseph "When Normality Becomes Distortion" [LCL Conference, Oct 2011] [The Zeitgeist Movement]'

When Normality becomes Distortion: Reflections on a World gone Mad.

This program will consider the quality of our beliefs, actions and intents within the overarching context of what supports good public health, prosperity and sustainability and what does not. The subjects of Politics, Economics and Religious Philosophy will be broadly considered, with one basic question asked: Are the dominant views of reality today and the values that arise from them sustainable for the species' survival?

Peter Joseph is the creator of the world famous, award winning "Zeitgeist Film Series" and founder of the controversial "Zeitgeist Movement" which seeks to shift our social system into a more sustainable paradigm, Peter continues to focus on media related expressions, including music composition, performance & film production, each with the focus on affecting society for the better. He has also lectured around the world on the topics of social sustainably and has been featured in the New York Times, Russia Today, TedX and many other outlets.

Peter Joseph "When Normality Becomes Distortion" [LCL Conference, Oct 2011] [The Zeitgeist Movement]

Friday, October 7, 2011

MORE QE - Central Banks in Europe Expand Global Push to Avert Recession


Europe’s leading central banks returned to crisis-fighting mode, expanding a push by global monetary-policy makers to support economies and financial markets while fiscal authorities struggle to act.

The European Central Bank, after a meeting yesterday in Berlin, said it would reintroduce purchases of covered bonds and yearlong loans for banks to support markets rattled by the region’s sovereign-debt crisis. In London, the Bank of England boosted its asset-purchase program by more than a third to 275 billion pounds ($424 billion) in a bid to avert a new recession in the U.K.

International central bankers are softening their anti- inflation stances or reviving programs to keep financial systems liquid as they race to keep slumping growth from turning into a full-fledged contraction. The Federal Reserve has eased policy two months in a row, while central banks in Malaysia and South Korea have refrained from raising rates as they focus on maintaining growth over damping price increases.

“There has been a recent shift in central banking across the world, in the West toward easing and in emerging markets putting tightening on hold with an option to ease if necessary,” said Gerard Lyons, London-based chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank. The fiscal and monetary policy “cupboard is almost bare in the West, so pressure is on the central banks to do more of the heavy lifting.”

Australia’s central bank signaled Oct. 4 it has scope to lower the highest benchmark interest rate among developed economies if necessary as inflation pressures ease. Turkey and Russia stepped up sales of foreign-currency reserves this week.

Risk Aversion

“We have a substantial increase in risk aversion, and that is affecting flows into the emerging markets and their economies,” said Ted Truman, a former Fed official and assistant Treasury secretary, who’s now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. “Many of their currencies are weakening, and there’s a recognition that the global economy which they live off of is slowing down.

Brazil plans moderate interest-rate reductions after a surprise cut Aug. 31 to 12 percent, a government official familiar with monetary policy said this week on condition of anonymity. Last week, Israel’s central bank lowered its benchmark rate for the first time in 2 1/2 years, to 3 percent.

The Fed said last month it would replace $400 billion of short-term debt in its portfolio with longer-term Treasuries in a program dubbed Operation Twist. In August, the central bank said its benchmark interest rate would probably stay near zero through at least mid-2013, amending previous language for a less-specific “extended period.”

Additional Easing

Additional easing may be in the offing. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) economists last week forecast the average interest rate of developed economies, weighted for gross domestic product, will fall to 0.62 percent by the end of the year from 0.80 percent. In emerging markets, it will drop to 5.80 percent from 5.93 percent.

“We’re going to see further measures,” said Tim Drayson, a global economist at Legal & General Investment Management in London. “There’s clearly more scope for the Fed for going to QE3, and the ECB can cut rates,” he said, referring to a third round of quantitative easing, or large-scale asset purchases.

The euro reversed losses after the ECB’s rate decision to rise 0.7 percent to $1.3437 at 5 p.m. in New York. The pound lost 0.1 percent against the dollar to $1.5445. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of stocks rose 1.8 percent to 1,164.97 at 4 p.m.

Final Meeting

ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet, overseeing his final monetary-policy decision before retiring, said at a Berlin press conference yesterday that the central bank will spend 40 billion euros ($54 billion) on covered bonds starting next month and will offer banks two additional unlimited loans of 12 and 13- month durations. He also said the ECB will continue to lend banks as much money as they need in its regular refinancing operations at least until July 2012.

Policy makers left the benchmark interest rate at 1.5 percent, where it’s been since July 7. With inflation accelerating to 3 percent last month, the ECB is resisting calls to reverse this year’s two quarter-point rate increases even amid speculation a recession is impending, Greece edges toward default and investors express concern about potential European bank losses. The ECB is the first line of support for markets as European governments piece together a new plan to solve their region’s debt strains.

‘Intensified Downside Risks’

Ongoing tensions in financial markets and unfavorable effects on financing conditions are likely to dampen the pace of economic growth in the euro area in the second half of this year,” Trichet said. There are “intensified downside risks” to the economic outlook, he said.

The Bank of England’s nine-member Monetary Policy Committee, led by Governor Mervyn King, raised the ceiling for so-called quantitative easing from 200 billion pounds. That’s the biggest expansion since the first round of stimulus in March 2009. Only 11 of 32 economists in a Bloomberg News survey predicted an increase in asset purchases.

The central bank acted a day after a report showed Europe’s second-biggest economy grew less than previously estimated in the quarter through June.

The pledge to buy the most bonds since the depths of the credit crisis shows King and his colleagues are prioritizing the recovery over the threat from inflation, which is running more than double the central bank’s target. The onus to boost expansion is on Bank of England as the nation’s government remains committed to delivering the toughest fiscal squeeze since World War II.

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Central Banks in Europe Expand Global Push to Avert Recession

Read also: World facing worst financial crisis in history, Bank of England Governor says

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Ron Paul: We Have Crossed the Rubicon towards Empire and Tyranny

Ron Paul speaks at the National Press Club.

Ron Paul: We Have Crossed the Rubicon towards Empire and Tyranny

US SHOWDOWN - Police vs Protestors | Wall Street protesters march in New York


Thousands of protesters have marched on New York's financial district, with rallies also held in other US cities.

Powerful unions gave a high-profile boost to the long-running demonstrations, as their members joined the rally in lower Manhattan.

Students at several US colleges walked out of classes in solidarity.

The activists have vented grievances over the 2008 corporate bailouts, high US unemployment and home repossessions, among other things.

Hundreds of demonstrators were arrested last weekend on the Brooklyn Bridge.

'Country upside down'

On Wednesday, smaller protests were held from Boston and Chicago to Los Angeles and San Francisco.

The biggest event took place in New York, where at least 5,000 activists joined forces with members of unions and community organisations to march on Wall Street.

"Our workers are excited about this movement," United Federation of Teachers president Michael Mulgrew told Reuters news agency. "The country has been turned upside down. We are fighting for families and children."

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Communications Workers of America and the Amalgamated Transit Union joined the New York march, as did the nation's largest union of nurses, National Nurses United.

The Occupy Wall Street protests started on 17 September with a few dozen demonstrators who tried to pitch tents in front of the New York Stock Exchange.

Since then, hundreds have set up camp nearby in Zuccotti Park and have become increasingly organised, lining up medical aid and legal help and printing their own newspaper.

Protesters in New York City on Wednesday carried signs reading "Jobs Not Cuts" and "Stop Corporate Greed" and chanted "Wall Street is our street".

"We're here to stop corporate greed," Mike Pellegrino, an NYC Transit bus mechanic, told the Associated Press news agency. "They should pay their fair share of taxes. We're just working and looking for decent lives for our families."

Hundreds of college students at New York's public university system walked out of classes on Wednesday afternoon.

At the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, students walked out of their classrooms at noon, holding signs reading "Eat the Elite" and "We Can Do Better than Capitalism".

'I'm the 99%'

In Boston, about 200 Northeastern University students protested against what they called corporate control of government and spiralling education costs.

In San Francisco, a crowd of several hundred marched in a loop around the financial district, chanting "They got bailed out, we got sold out". Union nurses had a large presence at the protest.

Continue reading - BBC - Wall Street protesters march in New York

See also: Unions lend muscle, resources to Wall St. protests

Police Club, Pepper Spray #occupywallstreet Protestors @ Wall Street 10.05.11

Shocking Video of NYC Violence: Police beat up protesters storming barricades

police beating at wall street #ows by We are Change

Police brutally attacks Occupy Wall Street protesters -- raw video

Occupy Wall Street - Unions join the protests

Wall Street Crackdown: Police beat back protesters, dozens arrested

Oct 5

OCCUPYWALLST @FOLEY SQUARE

-OccupyWallStreet-When-you-call-on-the-99percent,-they-will-come-10-5-11

Los Angeles

The Battle to occupy Los Angeles

Oct 9

Occupy Wall Street: Too Big to Ignore

Fox News Lies

'Fox News Lies!' OWS owns Geraldo Rivera

AFP

Listening Post - 'Occupy Wall street: A media blackout?

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

As Euro Crisis Deepens, Calls for Central Bank to Act

Jean-Claude Trichet’s last few weeks as president of the European Central Bank may be his most contentious.

Mr. Trichet is scheduled to hold the last news conference of his eight-year term on Thursday in Berlin, amid speculation that the bank could cut its benchmark interest rate just three months after raising it.

Some analysts doubt that the central bank will reverse course so quickly, but they are nearly unanimous in thinking that it will need to do something at its monetary policy meeting on Thursday to respond to the deteriorating conditions in the euro zone economy and the banking system.

Recent events have highlighted the bank’s role as the only institution in the euro area with the flexibility and resources to respond quickly to a crisis that seems to grow more acute by the day.

Euro zone governments are struggling to approve a bailout fund in a politically charged process that has focused an improbable amount of international attention on the parliamentary debates in Finland and Slovakia. Yet the fund, at a proposed 440 billion euros ($585 billion), already appears inadequate for the growing scale of the crisis.

At the same time, fears about European banks seem to be coming true. For instance, Dexia, a French and Belgian institution, may break up because of its exposure to Greek debt.

“We are coping with the worst crisis since World War II,” Mr. Trichet said Tuesday before the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee of the European Parliament.

Analysts at the Royal Bank of Scotland see a better than even chance that the European Central Bank will cut its benchmark rate to 1.25 percent from 1.5 percent on Thursday, but they acknowledge that it is not an easy call.

The European Central Bank’s governing council, which includes the chiefs of the central banks of the 17 members of the European Union that use the euro, is divided and has been sending conflicting signals. Earlier this year, Mr. Trichet clearly flagged rate moves in advance.

“When I listen to what the governing council members have said in the last few days, there is no consensus,” said Michael Schubert, an economist in Frankfurt for Commerzbank.

One argument for cutting rates on Thursday is that Mr. Trichet will want to do a favor for his successor, Mario Draghi, governor of the Bank of Italy. Mr. Draghi, who will take office Nov. 1, will be under pressure to establish his credentials as an inflation fighter, and he risks undermining his credibility if he oversees a rate cut immediately upon assuming the presidency.

But inflation hard-liners like Jens Weidmann, the president of the Bundesbank, are likely to argue vehemently against a rate cut even though evidence is building that Europe is going into a recession. Inflation in the euro area probably rose to an annual rate of 3 percent in September, according to official estimates, well above the central bank’s target of about 2 percent.

The European Central Bank might seek a compromise and take less controversial steps to show it is not watching idly as the banking crisis becomes more acute. It could revive its purchase of secured debt issues by banks, for example, or extend low-interest lending to struggling institutions.

None of those moves would solve the debt crisis, though, nor would a large rate cut, for that matter. But the central bank is unlikely to take more radical steps, like printing money to buy huge quantities of government bonds to relieve the banks of damaged assets.


Mr. Trichet signaled Tuesday that political leaders should not expect the central bank to rescue them. “We cannot substitute for governments,” he told the parliamentary panel.

Continue reading - NY Times - As Euro Crisis Deepens, Calls for Central Bank to Act

In Europe, Signs of 2nd Recession With Wide Reach

The European debt problems that have roiled global financial markets for the last 18 months are showing signs of turning into a far deeper challenge: Europe’s second recession in three years.

Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain are already in downturns or fighting to avoid them, as high unemployment and austerity belt-tightening take their toll. But in the last few weeks, even prosperous Germany and France, the Continent’s powerhouses, have started to be dragged down, hurt by the ebbing of business orders from indebted countries in the rest of Europe.

European stocks continued their latest plunge on Tuesday, as the German financial giant Deutsche Bank, buffeted by the debt crisis, reduced its profit forecast for the year. Investors were also jolted by news that the French-Belgian investment bank Dexia might be the region’s first large bank to need a government rescue as a result of the current debt crisis.

It is not just the Continent’s problem.

The United States, a major banking and trading partner with Europe, is stuck in its own rut — prompting the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, to warn Tuesday that “the recovery is close to faltering.” He told a Congressional panel that the economy could fall into a new recession unless the government took further action.

United States stocks ended up for the day, but had bounced wildly on jitters about Europe and rising fears that Greece would have to default on its sovereign — or government — debt. The Greek finance minister said Tuesday that the country could continue to pay its bills at least through mid-November, after other European finance ministers said Greece would not receive its next installment of bailout money before next month, if then.

A downturn in Europe, if it happens, could help tip America back into recession and would undoubtedly ricochet around the world. Europe’s banks are among the most interconnected in the world, and the euro is the world’s second-largest reserve currency after the dollar.

The 17 European Union nations that share the euro together account for about one-fifth of global output. And emerging markets that are important customers for European exports, like China and Brazil, are beginning to retrench.

We are the epicenter of this global crisis,” Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the European Central Bank, said on Tuesday at the European Parliament.

A growing chorus of analysts now predict that Europe is heading for an outright recession. “The sovereign debt crisis is like a fungus on the economy,” said Jörg Krämer, the chief economist at Commerzbank. “I thought it would be just a slowdown,” he said. “But I have changed my mind.”

Already, the euro zone economy has slowed to essentially zero growth. It could stay in a slump, many economists say, at least through next spring. If that happens, tax revenue is likely to fall and unemployment, already high, is expected to rise, making it even more difficult for Europe to address the sovereign debt crisis and protect its shaky banks.

In a sign of how quickly the ground is shifting, the European Central Bank might lower interest rates on Thursday — just a few months after it started raising them in what is now seen as a misguided effort to stem incipient inflation.

Distress is increasingly evident across Europe.

In Italy, which has the euro zone’s third-largest economy, after those of Germany and France, a 45 billion euro austerity program aimed at reducing debt has many worried about a recession. On Tuesday, the ratings agency Moody’s downgraded Italian government bonds by three notches, to A2 from Aa2, and kept a negative outlook on the rating.

At the start of the year, Mr. Bastianello was more optimistic that Europe would escape its troubles and that the government might seriously tackle Italy’s problems. “But the turbulence of the markets and the uncertainty about this abnormal mass of public debt just scare people away from buying,” he said.

The worldwide dimension of the financial crisis, Mr. Figueiredo added, made the outcome even more uncertain. “We’re now in the middle of a crisis that started in American real estate and then crossed over to Europe, and it seems really nobody has any idea where this will go next and for how long.

After growth in Portugal, Greece, Spain, and Italy started to trail off last year, he shifted his focus to Germany. Mr. Libner figures it will take at least a decade for any real growth to return to Southern Europe, particularly in Spain and Greece, which he classifies as “a catastrophe.”

Mr. Libner said he hoped Paris’s efforts to bring the country’s deficit and overall debt into line with European rules would allow France to keep its AAA bond rating — provided that European leaders figure out how to contain the debt crisis to Greece. If that happens, he said, Europe could rebound quickly, as investors regain faith in the viability of the euro union.

But if it does not happen, and Europe’s banks become further ensnared in the crisis — he shuddered at the thought. “We can pay for Greece, but not for all of Europe,” he said. If the crisis swells, he added, “we won’t have the means to pay for all of this.”

Continue reading - NY Times - In Europe, Signs of 2nd Recession With Wide Reach

Ron Paul Subcommittee - Audit the Fed: Dodd-Frank, QE3, and Federal Reserve Transparency

Before the US House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology Hearing on: "Audit the Fed: Dodd-Frank, QE3, and Federal Reserve Transparency," October 4th, 2011

In his 1974 Nobel Prize address, the late Austrian economist Friedrich von Hayek attacked the pretense of knowledge, the idea that policymakers have sufficient knowledge and power to shape society as they wish. Our political leaders failed to take Hayek's message to heart, as succeeding generations have continued to allow this intellectual arrogance to continue unabated. Just as the New Mandarins squandered America's wealth, resources, and young men during the 1960s, today's economic Mandarins seem hell-bent on destroying every last vestige of the free market and driving the economy into ruin. Congress has abdicated its oversight over these "expert" economists at the Federal Reserve, to the detriment of the economic well-being of the American people. Despite overwhelming grassroots support behind auditing the Fed, only incremental progress has been made toward unmasking the Federal Reserve's activities. Full transparency of the Fed's operations remains an elusive goal, but one towards which I intend to devote my remaining time in Congress.

The Fed has been given a monopoly by Congress to conduct monetary policy, and in so doing it tinkers with the most important price of all, the rate of interest. Interest rates reflect the price of time, and changes in the interest rate affect the structure of production. Forcing changes to the interest rate, as the Fed does, has a more pronounced effect on the economy than any law Congress has ever passed. Interest rates are used by individuals to make decisions about what type of investments they undertake, how much money they invest, and for how long. The higher the interest rate, the more likely an individual is to save money; the lower the interest rate, the less likely he is to save. Borrowers take the interest rate into account when borrowing money to buy a house, pay college tuition, or start or expand a business. The lower the interest rate, the cheaper it becomes to borrow money and the more likely individuals are to borrow; the higher the interest rate, the less likely they are to borrow. In a free market, some people will want to save while others will want to borrow, and the interest rate is the price that coordinates the actions of borrowers and savers.

Manipulating the interest rate as the Federal Reserve does causes an enormous ripple effect throughout the economy. Most people do not think about how interest rates came to be, they merely make their economic calculations and decisions based on what the prevailing rate of interest is. Every day people go to work, buy and sell goods, and move their money in and out of the banking system. The isolated actions undertaken by individuals combine to create the market. The market is a truly awesome thing which most of us take for granted. No one marvels that bananas and oranges are available in supermarkets year-round, that cars from Germany and Japan travel our roads, or that our houses have electric lighting and indoor plumbing. Yet it was the actions of millions of people, each acting in his own self-interest and without any knowledge of how his actions might affect other people down the road, that resulted in each of those things happening. When government begins to interfere in that process, it leads to all sorts of problems.

As we meet here in this hearing room, the Federal Reserve is engaging in the second coming of Operation Twist, attempting to force already-low interest rates even lower. This crisis was begun because of the Federal Reserve's low interest rate policy which distorted the economy by shuttling resources and investment that would have been better allocated elsewhere into the housing sector. Instead of recognizing the futility of trying to inflate our way to prosperity with artificially low interest rates, and allowing the interest rates to reset to a true, market-determined rate, and allowing prices to fall so as to allow malinvested resources to be put to better use, the Fed repeated the mistakes of the past by pumping more money into the economy. With an official inflation rate of nearly four percent, interest rates on savings accounts of well less than one percent, and a stock market that has stagnated over the past three years, there is no incentive whatsoever for consumers to save or invest. Money sitting in the bank a year ago would have lost nearly four percent of its value by now, money invested in the stock market just as much, and money invested in Treasury bonds over one and a quarter percent. Is it any wonder that people have decided to consume rather than to save?

Savings and investment are required for economic growth, deferring present consumption in the hopes of gaining some greater future consumption. Imagine savings and investment in terms of wheat. Most of the wheat that is grown will be consumed after harvest, but a small amount will have to be saved for seed, in order to grow next year's crop. The more that is able to be saved for seed, the larger the crop will be in future years, enabling increased wheat consumption. What the Federal Reserve's actions are telling people is: don't save, there is no need. Consume that seed and don't worry about the future. And that is what this country has been doing for years. Capital is being consumed through the government's spurring of consumption, encouraging people to take on debt to fund frivolous spending and failing not only to increase present capital but also failing to replenish capital that is used up in the production process.

This all leads us to the need for Federal Reserve transparency. Congressional oversight of the Fed amounts to about twelve hours of hearings per year, and that's as far as it goes. Of those twelve hours, no more than five or ten minutes goes to any one Congressman, who has the opportunity to ask at most one question of Chairman Bernanke every six months. To claim that this is effective oversight is laughable. Even the increased amount of data disclosure mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, a relative sea change, is only due to be released two years after the fact. The legislative cycle in Congress is so fast that many of us up here do not even remember what took place two weeks ago, let alone two years ago. Trying to set up a hearing such as this one requires weeks, if not months, of advance planning. To imagine that two years after the fact Congress will really seek to dig into the details of the Federal Reserve's lending activities defies common sense. Two years ago the Fed was already well into its first round of quantitative easing, it has since completed a second round, and it is now embarking on a third intervention into bond markets.

Attempting to audit the Fed through passage of new legislation is time-consuming as well. It took nearly a year and a half of effort to enact the few measures that made it into the Dodd-Frank Act. And this year my Audit the Fed bill has been referred, not to the Financial Services Committee as Fed audit bills have been for 40+ years, but to the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. While I am hopeful that Chairman Issa will act on that bill, which has over 180 cosponsors, time is quickly slipping away for this Congress to act.

While the Federal Reserve is not fully transparent, what is transparent are the effects the Fed's policy actions have on everyday people. A young couple is thrilled that interest rates are at historic lows so they take out a mortgage in order to buy the house they had always wanted. But as the Fed continues to print money in order to suppress interest rates, the price of food and heating begins to rise. Expenses rise faster than their paycheck, and they find themselves falling behind on their mortgage and eventually face foreclosure. Or imagine the elderly retiree dependent on Social Security and a small amount of savings. She has not received a cost of living increase to her Social Security in years, despite the ever-increasing cost of food and health care. Extended low interest rates mean that her savings account earns almost no interest each year, so her savings are rapidly depleting. She fears that within a couple of years she may be left with no money and no way to support herself. And then there is the single mother who has been laid off from work for the past 18 months because the rising prices of production inputs caused by the Fed's inflationary monetary policy forced her employer to downsize the company in order to reduce costs. And with prices for the company's finished goods continuing to rise as the Fed continues pumping new money into the economy, consumer demand has dropped, making it all the more likely that her company will never be able to rehire her.

But rest assured, the Fed tells us, as long as the bankers are doing alright, everything will be fine. Indeed, the banks do appear to be doing fine. Flush with cash and receiving interest payments from the Fed on their excess reserves, the financial sector has continued to record amazing profits. Every time a new piece of disappointing economic data comes out, we hear renewed cries from Wall Street for more action on the part of the Federal Reserve. Amazingly, some people are complaining that the latest round of $400 billion in bond purchases is too small. The fact that a $400 billion operation, equivalent to half the size of the Fed's pre-crisis balance sheet, is considered paltry is a sad indicator of how easily so many Americans are willing to accept big government. Bailouts of the financial sector are the new normal, only now they are conducted covertly through the Fed rather than through Congressional action so as not to arouse public ire as in 2008.

The Federal Reserve is a creature of Congress and should be treated as such, not as an organization exempt from Congressional oversight. Claims from the Fed and its defenders that a full audit of the Fed would endanger the Fed's independence are an attempt at provoking fears that Congress would directly intervene in the conduct of monetary policy. A bill that sets interest rates would endanger the Fed's independence; a bill that audits the Fed does not. Nowhere in any audit proposals has anyone ever expressed the desire that Congress dictate monetary policy or attempt to set interest rates. Congress does not have this power, nor should it, but it is accountable to the people through the ballot box; not so with the Federal Reserve, which tries to remain unaccountable both to Congress and to the American people. Pumping trillions of dollars into the economy with no oversight and accountability cannot be allowed to continue. Audit the Fed now.

Ron Paul: Audit the Fed!


Audit the Fed Hearing: 10/04/11 - Feat. Dr. Robert D. Auerbach


Audit the Fed Hearing: 10/04/11 Q&A - Feat. Dr. Ron Paul, Dr. Robert Auerbach, Dr. Mark Calabria


Full Fed Audit Hearing Oct 4 2011

GREECE REVOLT - Greeks Strike Against Job Cuts as Aid Delayed


Hundreds of thousands of Greeks are walking off their jobs at airports, schools, hospitals and even the Acropolis to protest Prime Minister George Papandreou’s 6.6 billion-euro ($8.7 billion) austerity plan, challenging a government seeking European bailout funds to stave off default.

Today’s 24-hour strike, the first this year that will shut the Athens International Airport for a full day, takes place after European Union ministers signaled they may renegotiate terms of Greece’s latest rescue, sending the nation’s stocks down the most in 17 months.

The country’s largest public-sector union, known as ADEDY and representing at least 400,000 state workers, called the walkout and a march on parliament to protest plans to put 30,000 public workers on reduced pay, raise property taxes and cut pensions and wages. The demonstration defies calls by the government to show unity in the struggle to avert a default.

“We are at the worst circumstances under the worst conditions,” Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos said at a news conference in Athens yesterday. “We are dependent on the aid and loans of our institutional partners. That is the situation of the country. And we must make superhuman efforts to win this wager of history.”

Rising Debt

The government is dependent on outside financing as the economy contracts and the unemployment rate stands at more than double Germany’s. The Greek state, which employs about 750,000, carries a debt load that will reach 356.5 billion euros in 2011, or the equivalent of 161.8 percent of gross domestic product, the highest in the EU and three times the ratio of Poland.

While strikes and protests are common in Greece, the timing of the latest confrontation may cause investors to take notice, said Antonio Garcia Pascual, the chief southern European economist at Barclays Capital in London.

“It’s important to understand the degree of participation in these strikes,” he said in a telephone interview yesterday. “If it’s a massive demonstration with really large numbers, then surely investors will take note of that.”

Airports Shut

Air traffic controllers and employees at the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority will cease work for 24 hours today, the first all-day work stoppage for aviation workers this year. Aegean Airlines SA (AEGN) canceled all its flights and Olympic Air axed 89 flights, according to an e-mailed statement from both Athens- based carriers. Schools, archaeological sites and museums also are closed.

“We have workers who have had their wages cut by 40 percent and with the new measures it will surpass 50 percent,” ADEDY Chairman Costas Tsikrikas said by phone from Athens. “These measures, and all the measures that have been passed so far, are putting the heaviest weight on workers and pensioners, not on those who earn the most and have sent their money outside Greece to foreign banks.”

General Strike


The General Confederation of Labor, or GSEE, the country’s largest private sector union that represents workers at state- run companies and utilities, plan to participate in the walkout and called a general strike for Oct. 19.

Greece’s average unemployment rate is expected to climb to 16.4 percent next year from 15.2 percent in 2011, according to ministry forecasts. Germany’s jobless rate was 6.9 percent in September. The economy contracted 4.5 percent in 2010 and will shrink 5.5 percent this year, Finance Ministry forecasts show.

“We have taken decisions as a government and as a parliament but as a society we have not taken a clear decision,” Venizelos said yesterday. “Unfortunately our society, our country, is hostage to great contradictions.”

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Greeks Strike Against Job Cuts as Aid Delayed

Raw Video: Greek Civil Servants Walk Off the Job

Greek austerity clashes with police

Video: Riot police storm Athens metro during strike demo

Mass Greek fury as EU cooks up more bad debt bailouts

Greek Debtlock: Riot squads fire tear gas at bailout protesters

Monday, October 3, 2011

UK REVOLT - Anti-cuts march in Manchester







More than 35,000 people have taken part in a march through central Manchester protesting against government cuts.

The TUC organised the March for the Alternative to coincide with the Conservative Party conference. Many protesters wanted tax avoidance tackled and spending to encourage growth.

On the eve of the conference, David Cameron pledged no U-turns on cuts and dismissed calls for extra spending.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said no arrests had been made during the march.
'People are angry'

A post-march rally was held at Number One First Street close to the conference centre.

About 200 protesters from the anti-cuts group Occupy broke away from the main march and positioned themselves in Albert Square, where they said they intended to stage a sit-in.

GMP said that some people had initially covered their faces, but were asked to remove hoods and scarves.

A small group of protesters attempted to break into the Bridgewater Hall, the home of Manchester's Halle Orchestra, but were stopped by police.

One woman fell during the march and was treated for head injuries, but no other casualties were reported.

Members of the Salford branch of the TUC began their march into the city at 10:30 BST.

Other groups took part in the protests, including students and animal rights groups.

Manchester Central Labour MP Tony Lloyd, who was among those at the head of the march, said: "People here are angry, but many are frightened.

"This government is slashing billions and billions from our public services.

"Even top Tories are calling on George Osborne to go for a proper Plan B and go for growth."

Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, who also took part, said: "We all know the cuts are hurting, but they're not working and you can't cut your way out of a recession.

"If you clawed all the tax back that has been evaded and avoided and you put in a Robin Hood tax, we'd raise a very, very, large amount of money."

Continue reading - BBC - Anti-cuts march in Manchester

Manchester March: Over 30,000 protest UK govt cuts push

Where Does Money Come From?

What is money? How is it created? How does it enter into circulation? These are simple and vital questions it might seem, but the answers remain contested and often muddled.

There is widespread misunderstanding of how new money is created. This book examines the workings of the UK monetary system and concludes that the most useful description is that new money is created by commercial banks when they extend or create credit, either through making loans or buying existing assets. In creating credit, banks simultaneously create deposits in our bank accounts, which, to all intents and purposes, is money.

Many people would be surprised to learn that even among bankers, economists, and policymakers, there is no common understanding of how new money is created. This is a problem for two main reasons. First, in the absence of this understanding, attempts at banking reform are more likely to fail. Second, the creation of new money and the allocation of purchasing power are a vital economic function and highly profitable. This is therefore a matter of significant public interest and not an obscure technocratic debate. Greater clarity and transparency about this could improve both the democratic legitimacy of the banking system and our economic prospects.

Defining money is surprisingly difficult. We cut through the tangled historical and theoretical debate to identify that anything widely accepted as payment, particularly by the government as payment of tax, is, to all intents and purpose, money. This includes bank credit because although an IOU from a friend is not acceptable at the tax office or in the local shop, an IOU from a bank most definitely is.

We identify that the UK’s national currency exists in three main forms, the second two of which exist in electronic form:

1. Cash – banknotes and coins.

2. Central bank reserves – reserves held by commercial banks at the Bank of England.

3. Commercial bank money – bank deposits created either when commercial banks lend money, thereby crediting credit borrowers’ deposit accounts, make payments on behalf of customers using their overdraft facilities, or when they purchase assets from the private sector and make payments on their own account (such as salary or bonus payments).  


Only the Bank of England or the government can create the first two forms of money, which is referred to in this book as ‘central bank money’. Since central bank reserves do not actually circulate in the economy, we can further narrow down the money supply that is actually circulating as consisting of cash and commercial bank money.

Physical cash accounts for less than 3 per cent of the total stock of money in the economy. Commercial bank money – credit and coexistent deposits – makes up the remaining 97 per cent of the money supply.

There are several conflicting ways of describing what banks do. The simplest version is that banks take in money from savers, and lend this money out to borrowers. This is not at all how the process works. Banks do not need to wait for a customer to deposit money before they can make a new loan to someone else. In fact, it is exactly the opposite; the making of a loan creates a new deposit in the customer’s account.

More sophisticated versions bring in the concept of ‘fractional reserve banking’. This description recognises that banks can lend out many times more than the amount of cash and reserves they hold at the Bank of England. This is a more accurate picture, but is still incomplete and misleading. It implies a strong link between the amount of money that banks create and the amount that they hold at the central bank. It is also commonly assumed by this approach that the central bank has significant control over the amount of reserves banks hold with it.

We find that the most accurate description is that banks create new money whenever they extend credit, buy existing assets or make payments on their own account, which mostly involves expanding their assets, and that their ability to do this is only very weakly linked to the amount of reserves they hold at the central bank. At the time of the financial crisis, for example, banks held just £1.25 in reserves for every £100 issued as credit. Banks operate within an electronic clearing system that nets out multilateral payments at the end of each day, requiring them to hold only a tiny proportion of central bank money to meet their payment requirements.

The power of commercial banks to create new money has many important implications for economic prosperity and financial stability. We highlight four that are relevant to the reforms of the banking system under discussion at the time of writing:

1. Although useful in other ways, capital adequacy requirements have not and do not constrain money creation, and therefore do not necessarily serve to restrict the expansion of banks’ balance sheets in aggregate. In other words, they are mainly ineffective in preventing credit booms and their associated asset price bubbles.

2. Credit is rationed by banks, and the primary determinant of how much they lend is not interest rates, but confidence that the loan will be repaid and confidence in the liquidity and solvency of other banks and the system as a whole.

3. Banks decide where to allocate credit in the economy. The incentives that they face often lead them to favour lending against collateral, or assets, rather than lending for investment in production. As a result, new money is often more likely to be channelled into property and financial speculation than to small businesses and manufacturing, with profound economic consequences for society.

4. Fiscal policy does not in itself result in an expansion of the money supply. Indeed, the government has in practice no direct involvement in the money creation and allocation process. This is little known, but has an important impact on the effectiveness of fiscal policy and the role of the government in the economy.


The basic analysis of this book is neither radical nor new. In fact, central banks around the world support the same description of where new money comes from. And yet many naturally resist the notion that private banks can really create money by simply making an entry in a ledger. Economist J. K. Galbraith suggested why this might be:

"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. When something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent."

This book aims to firmly establish a common understanding that commercial banks create new money. There is no deeper mystery, and we must not allow our mind to be repelled. Only then can we properly address the much more significant question: Of all the possible alternative ways in which we could create new money and allocate purchasing power, is this really the best?

Foreword and Overview

Source: Where Does Money Come From?

Where does money come from?

PORTUGAL REVOLT - Thousands march in Portugal against austerity



Tens of thousands marched in Lisbon and Porto on Saturday to protest against austerity measures imposed under the terms of an EU/IMF bailout, the first major rallies since a center-right government took power in Portugal in June.

The largest union, CGTP, which organized the demonstrations, called for more rallies and labor action in the week of October 20-27 "against impoverishment and injustice, against the aggression by the International Monetary Fund."

CGTP leader Manuel Carvalho da Silva said as many as 130,000 people took part in the rally in Lisbon, where protesters filled the central Liberdade thoroughfare. Police declined to provide an estimate of the crowd.

The tax on electricity and gas bills rose to 23 percent from 6 on Saturday to help plug a budget shortfall. Portugal is trying to avoid the fate of Greece, where a debt crisis has left the country on the brink of default.

Unlike in Greece and other European countries that have been the scene of violent protests against austerity measures, rallies in Portugal are traditionally peaceful and Saturday's was no exception.

Da Silva stopped short of calling for a general strike which Portugal last witnessed in November.

Under the terms of the 78 billion-euro ($104 billion) bailout, Portugal has to hike taxes, slash spending, apply structural reforms, especially in the labor market, and privatize state property to reduce the budget deficit.

The measures are forecast to cause a deep recession this year and next, and a rise in unemployment from the current level of more than 12 percent, which is already the highest in three decades.

"When we analyze the first 100 days of the new government, it's a disgrace ... the right and extreme right have no solution for the country's problems, no economic development," Carvalho da Silva told protesters.

"When they attack our rights, when poverty and injustice are growing, then our struggle has to be generalized, it has to be everyone's struggle."

The center-right coalition government took over in June backed by a solid parliamentary majority after a Socialist administration collapsed. The new government has promised to meet bailout-imposed budget deficit targets at any cost.

The unions reacted to the initial austerity drive last year with a general strike, but have since resorted to smaller sector strikes.

Analysts say social strife may intensify as higher taxes kick in, and as privatizations advance in companies such as the REN power grid operator and TAP airline.

Continue reading - Reuters - Thousands march in Portugal against austerity

Portuguese police in austerity protest

Sunday, October 2, 2011

INTERNATIONAL REVOLT - Occupy Together In Solidarity with Occupy Wall Street










Why are people occupying Wall Street? Why has the occupation – despite the latest police crackdown – sent out sparks across America, within days, inspiring hundreds of people to send pizzas, money, equipment and, now, to start their own movements called OccupyChicago, OccupyFlorida, in OccupyDenver or OccupyLA?

There are obvious reasons. We are watching the beginnings of the defiant self-assertion of a new generation of Americans, a generation who are looking forward to finishing their education with no jobs, no future, but still saddled with enormous and unforgivable debt. Most, I found, were of working-class or otherwise modest backgrounds, kids who did exactly what they were told they should: studied, got into college, and are now not just being punished for it, but humiliated – faced with a life of being treated as deadbeats, moral reprobates.

Is it really surprising they would like to have a word with the financial magnates who stole their future?

Just as in Europe, we are seeing the results of colossal social failure. The occupiers are the very sort of people, brimming with ideas, whose energies a healthy society would be marshaling to improve life for everyone. Instead, they are using it to envision ways to bring the whole system down.

But the ultimate failure here is of imagination. What we are witnessing can also be seen as a demand to finally have a conversation we were all supposed to have back in 2008. There was a moment, after the near-collapse of the world's financial architecture, when anything seemed possible.

Everything we'd been told for the last decade turned out to be a lie. Markets did not run themselves; creators of financial instruments were not infallible geniuses; and debts did not really need to be repaid – in fact, money itself was revealed to be a political instrument, trillions of dollars of which could be whisked in or out of existence overnight if governments or central banks required it. Even the Economist was running headlines like "Capitalism: Was it a Good Idea?"

It seemed the time had come to rethink everything: the very nature of markets, money, debt; to ask what an "economy" is actually for. This lasted perhaps two weeks. Then, in one of the most colossal failures of nerve in history, we all collectively clapped our hands over our ears and tried to put things back as close as possible to the way they'd been before.

Perhaps, it's not surprising. It's becoming increasingly obvious that the real priority of those running the world for the last few decades has not been creating a viable form of capitalism, but rather, convincing us all that the current form of capitalism is the only conceivable economic system, so its flaws are irrelevant. As a result, we're all sitting around dumbfounded as the whole apparatus falls apart.

What we've learned now is that the economic crisis of the 1970s never really went away. It was fobbed off by cheap credit at home and massive plunder abroad – the latter, in the name of the "third world debt crisis". But the global south fought back. The "alter-globalisation movement", was in the end, successful: the IMF has been driven out of East Asia and Latin America, just as it is now being driven from the Middle East. As a result, the debt crisis has come home to Europe and North America, replete with the exact same approach: declare a financial crisis, appoint supposedly neutral technocrats to manage it, and then engage in an orgy of plunder in the name of "austerity".

The form of resistance that has emerged looks remarkably similar to the old global justice movement, too: we see the rejection of old-fashioned party politics, the same embrace of radical diversity, the same emphasis on inventing new forms of democracy from below. What's different is largely the target: where in 2000, it was directed at the power of unprecedented new planetary bureaucracies (the WTO, IMF, World Bank, Nafta), institutions with no democratic accountability, which existed only to serve the interests of transnational capital; now, it is at the entire political classes of countries like Greece, Spain and, now, the US – for exactly the same reason. This is why protesters are often hesitant even to issue formal demands, since that might imply recognising the legitimacy of the politicians against whom they are ranged.

When the history is finally written, though, it's likely all of this tumult – beginning with the Arab Spring – will be remembered as the opening salvo in a wave of negotiations over the dissolution of the American Empire. Thirty years of relentless prioritising of propaganda over substance, and snuffing out anything that might look like a political basis for opposition, might make the prospects for the young protesters look bleak; and it's clear that the rich are determined to seize as large a share of the spoils as remain, tossing a whole generation of young people to the wolves in order to do so. But history is not on their side.

We might do well to consider the collapse of the European colonial empires. It certainly did not lead to the rich successfully grabbing all the cookies, but to the creation of the modern welfare state. We don't know precisely what will come out of this round. But if the occupiers finally manage to break the 30-year stranglehold that has been placed on the human imagination, as in those first weeks after September 2008, everything will once again be on the table – and the occupiers of Wall Street and other cities around the US will have done us the greatest favour anyone possibly can.

Continue reading - Occupy Wall Street rediscovers the radical imagination

Wall Street: #Occupy Wall Street

International: #Occupy Together
Occupy Australia
Occupy Adelaide
Occupy Brisbane
Occupy Cologne
Occupy Cork, Ireland
Occupy Den Haag, NL
Occupy Finland
Occupy Frankfurt Germany
Occupy Hamburg Germany
Occupy Manchester | March on the Tory Party Conference
Occupy Melbourne Australia
Occupy Montreal
Occupy Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Occupy Nova Scotia
Occupy Perth
Occupy Stockholm
Occupy Sydney
Occupy the London Stock Exchange
Occupy Tijuana
Occupy Tokyo
Occupy Toronto Market Exchange
Occupy Vancouver

Read also: The Zeitgeist Movement Response to Occupy Wall Street

We The People... Occupy Wall Street - Day 14


Occupy Wallstreet - Occupy NYPD HQ Plaza 30th September 2011


NYPD Arrests 700 #OccupyWallStreet Protesters On The Brooklyn Bridge


10/1/2011 Brooklyn Bridge :: Step by Step


Brooklyn Bridge shut down: RT's Occupy Wall Street footage


Occupy Wall Street Continues


Occupy Wall Street protest on Sept 30 in NYC


Occupy Wall Street Occupying Police Plaza - "General Assembly" - September 30, 2011


Occupy Wall Street -- faces of the revolution


#OccupyWallStreet to RT: Revolution at any cost!


Occupy Wall Street Begins To Go National!


Chicago

Critical Mass, Occupy Chicago and the Police - RAW VIDEO


Critical Mass Meets Occupy Chicago 9/30/11


Nobel Laureate

Joseph Stiglitz and Jeff Madrick @ #occupywallstreet Open Economic Forum


Oct 5

Thousands Join 'Occupy Wall Street' March