If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

From an American in London, Global Warnings


GOVERNMENTS are pushing austerity; bankers are hoarding cash; a recession looms in the United States and Europe. But Adam S. Posen has a solution: a shock-and-awe display of coordinated central bank attacks aimed at reviving sluggish economies.

An American economist on the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, Mr. Posen is no academic scribbler or lonely blogger, but someone inside the central banking establishment.

And, as a leading expert on what is often called Japan’s lost decade, he is particularly worried that the Federal Reserve in the United States and the European Central Bank are making the same monetary policy mistakes that left Japan’s once-robust economy stagnant all through the 1990s and even into the 21st century.

For months now, Mr. Posen — who got his bully pulpit at the Bank of England by answering an ad in The Economist — has been warning that policy makers in Washington and in Europe have been too optimistic about how quickly the global economy would recover from the financial crisis.

The joint action by central banks on Thursday to make it easier for weak European banks to borrow dollars is no doubt a policy nod in Mr. Posen’s direction, but it is still a far cry from the type of unified bond purchasing program, or quantitative easing, that he is advocating.

When Fed officials meet this week, they are widely expected to take further action to reduce long-term interest rates, a significant turnabout after months of suggesting that a recovery was solidly under way. The European Central Bank has not yet gone so far, but officials have recently signaled a new openness to reducing interest rates or at least to stop raising them.

In simplest terms, Mr. Posen wants central banks to print more money. A lot more money.

There is a certain tilting-at-windmills aspect to his crusade. The Fed will probably stop well short of the aggressive bond buying that Mr. Posen has advocated. Already, some Fed officials — and most Republican leaders, including the presidential hopefuls Rick Perry and Mitt Romney — believe that the Fed is at risk of rekindling inflation.

But that hasn’t stopped Mr. Posen from pressing his case. Earlier this month, he had lunch with Kiyohiko Nishimura, a deputy governor at the Bank of Japan, and Charles Evans, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. And, last Tuesday, he traveled to this small hamlet in southeast England to issue his most passionate cry yet ”I am here to warn policy makers in the United States, Europe, everywhere that we cannot take our foot off the pedal,” Mr. Posen said before a roomful of small-business leaders and bankers. “The outlook is grim — the right thing to do now is engage in more monetary stimulus.”

Although a few bubbles of sweat appeared on his forehead, Mr. Posen argued his brief here with aplomb — mixing self-deprecating remarks that touched on the oddity of a 44-year-old American prescribing monetary policy in Britain (“I get paid in pounds and pay rent in pounds,” he assured his audience) with a trenchant analysis of the economy’s various ills (stagnant growth, increasing unemployment and banks that will not lend).

His listeners hailed his proposal that the Bank of England and the British Treasury form a government-backed bank to make small-business loans. But on a day when inflation ticked up to 4.5 percent, among the highest annual rates in Europe, his call to monetary arms received a muted response.

”I am very worried about the consequences of quantitative easing,” said John Thurston, chairman of Watts, a local company that supplies parts and services to commercial vehicles. Watts has felt the effect of the business slump, but the inflationary impact of more government bond buying worried him.

“I just don’t know how you unwind it,” he said.

Mr. Thurston is not alone in his concern.

On the Bank of England’s nine-member monetary policy committee, Mr. Posen was the only one to vote last month for the bank to resume its bond purchasing program, according to minutes of the meeting.

IN addition to the Fed’s reluctance to start another bond-buying effort, the European Central Bank is also not expected to continue its current program of purchasing the bonds of weak euro zone economies for much longer.

Mr. Posen’s central premise is that governments in Japan, Europe and the United States are running the risk of repeating the policy mistakes of the 1930s, when the conventional wisdom called for strict monetary policy and budget cutting, only deepening the Depression.

Not that central bankers have exactly been sitting on their hands.

Their efforts clearly helped prevent the sharp recession of 2008-9 from turning into something much worse, and the Fed, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan have all bought large amounts of government bonds to help push down interest rates.

Now, with rates touching zero, the view has taken hold that to do more would risk stoking inflation and damage the credibility of central bankers.

But for Mr. Posen, such hand-wringing over inflation when unemployment is spiking in developed countries is not just misguided but irresponsible.

“I am really angry — we are getting these incredibly wimpy excuses for inaction,” Mr. Posen said, speaking broadly of central bank attitudes.

“My proposal is that the Bank of England buy £50 billion in gilts, although a good case can be made for doing more,” he said, referring to British government bonds.

Amid the secretive world of central banking, Mr. Posen strikes an arresting contrast. He is voluble, eager to please and, not being immune to a bit of gossip, has to restrain himself from revealing market-sensitive details about the bank’s inner workings.

More policy entrepreneur than wonk, Mr. Posen used his perch at the Peterson Institute of International Economics in Washington to push his core, Keynes-colored notion that governments and central banks must jump-start economies stuck in a slump when banks and the private sector show that they cannot.

A spate of papers on this topic that pointed to policy dithering in Japan brought him a measure of renown. He also showed an ability to ally himself with name-brand economists and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic. Early supporters include the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, while he was at Princeton, as well as Mervyn King, before he became governor of the Bank of England.

But it was not until 2009, when Mr. Posen joined the Bank of England, that he was given a chance to advance his views from inside the temple. Unlike the Fed or the European Central Bank, the Bank of England reserves several slots on its policy-making panel for outsiders.

He has an office at the bank’s grand headquarters on Threadneedle Street, is expected to show up there no more than three days a week and has the use of two trained economists to assist him in his big thinking and speech-making.

“It’s like being a governor of the Federal Reserve, only better because you are not stuck with the crap work,” Mr. Posen said. He is also very adept at explaining the dry arcana of monetary policy in a way that is understandable and offers up good guys (those in favor of quantitative easing) and bad guys (those who are not).

“Adam is very confident that inflation will come down, and he has said he will eat his hat if that does not happen,” said Charles Goodhart, an expert on central banks at the London School of Economics and an early mentor to Mr. Posen. “He may well be right — but many of his colleagues do not share this belief.”

While it is expected that economists become policy advocates, it is unusual for central bankers to fly their philosophical colors with the ardor that Mr. Posen has shown. “Amid a culture of group-think, Adam sticks his neck out,” said Hans-Helmut Kotz, a former board member at the Bundesbank of Germany.

Mr. Posen acknowledges late-night rants on his Facebook page earlier this year when his core thesis — that extraordinary action was needed to keep Britain from slipping into a second recession — was not being accepted by his colleagues on the bank’s monetary policy committee.

“It was agonizing. I mean I have been doing this for 25 years and here was the possibility that I could be fundamentally wrong,” he said. “I was lying awake at night — ask my wife.”

Even now, with signs of global weakness increasing by the day, it is unclear whether Mr. Posen will win the day.

In fact, many economists argue that with Europe and the United States burdened with a huge overhang of debt, with banks undercapitalized and reluctant to lend and with the American and British housing markets still in the doldrums, central banks are largely powerless to revive growth on their own.

My position is that once interest rates come to zero, there is not much more a central bank can do to stimulate the economy,” said Kazuo Ueda, an economist in Tokyo who served on the monetary policy board of the Bank of Japan as it struggled, unsuccessfully, to inject life into the Japanese economy.

In his recent paper, “The Effectiveness of Nontraditional Monetary Policy Measures: The Case of the Bank of Japan,” Mr. Ueda suggests that in Japan, structural economic defects and deflation were too powerful for even the most creative monetary policy interventions.

ECONOMISTS who share his view say that what is happening in Europe reinforces the point. Radical monetary easing, they argue, is no substitute for wrenching, yet necessary, structural changes like cutting wages and government spending and recapitalizing zombie banks. If anything, it’s an excuse not to put such reforms in place. But to Mr. Posen, those arguments are a poor excuse for inaction.

“The Austrians would say you just have to suffer through it,” he said, referring to a school of laissez-faire economic thought popularized by Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig Von Mises. “But suffering is not good for the soul — monetary policy won’t solve all your problems, but it can make things easier.”

Continue reading - NY Times - From an American in London, Global Warnings

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Greece: Man hurt after setting himself on fire

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT A man pours a flammable liquid on his body to set himself on fire outside a Piraeus bank branch in Thessaloniki in northern Greece September 16, 2011. The 55-year old man had entered the bank and asked for a renegotiation of his overdue loan payments on his home and business, according to police, which he could not pay, but was refused by the bank. (Reuters)








THESSALONIKI, Greece — Greek authorities say a 55-year-old man has been hospitalized with chest burns after dousing himself with gasoline and then setting his clothes on fire. The man shouted that he was in debt as he carried out the act.

Police said the incident occurred Friday in Thessaloniki, in northern Greece, in front of a bank. Police used fire extinguishers to put out the blaze.

The injured man was not identified, but police say he had also set himself on fire and suffered burns 15 months ago, after complaining he could not pay back the debts from his failed business.

Debt-plagued Greece is in its third year of recession, and is surviving on international rescue loans. Drastic cost-cutting measures have caused a rash of business failures and record unemployment.

Continue reading - Greece: Man hurt after setting himself on fire

MUST READ! Chief economist of Deutsche Bank: I'm an Austrian

The Chief Economist of Deutsche Bank Group, Thomas Mayer, has announced that he is “an Austrian in economics”. In a new paper released today by Deutsche Bank Research, based on a speech he gave this week, Mayer says that the Austrian theory of the business cycle describes what we are living through pretty well:

– Failure of the liquidationists to overcome the Great Depression of the early 1930s prepared the ground for an era of interventionist economic policies. Modern macroeconomics and finance nourished the belief that we can successfully plan for the future. But the present crisis teaches us that we live in a world of Knightian uncertainty, where the ―unknown unknowns dominate and our plans for the future are regularly thwarted by unforeseen and unforeseeable events. . . .

— …First and foremost, firms should have the incentives to follow sound business practices. The best incentive is to make failure possible. Hence, we need resolution regimes for financial firms.

— In a world where people have imperfect foresight and do not always behave rationally, and markets are not always efficient, we need to accept that economic policy cannot fine-tune the cycle.

— For us economists, the lesson from recent events should be to rely less on the development of theories by ―deduction (like in natural sciences) and to apply more induction(like in social and historical sciences). Failure to study history makes us repeat the mistakes of the past.

Mayer goes on to outline and argue for the mainstream Hayekian narrative of the last decade. Low interest rates inflated a bubble and knocked the whole economy out of kilter. Where non-Austrians misconstrue Hayek is in thinking that he is only focused on the bubble itself – they rightly point out that the housing sector itself wasn’t big enough to create our current stagnation. But Hayek’s genius was in recognising that the entire economy is interconnected, and credit distortions in one sector can disjoint the rest. If you imagine a tower of blocks, taking one block away (or changing its shape) can knock all the others down if it’s in the wrong place, even if it’s relatively small. Similarly, credit distortions affect the whole economy because everything is so interlinked.

Paper: I'm an Austrian in economics

Zeitgeist: Requiem for One | The Zeitgeist Media Festival 2011

Zeitgeist: Requiem for One" [2011] is a 32 min. performance piece for Audio and Video Display accompanied by live acoustic and electronic instruments. This work actually mirrors the original intention of what became "Zeitgeist: The Movie" in 2007. The work is, in part, a medley of the Zeitgeist Film Series as it exists, coupled with the concurrent theme of sadness resulting from the gestural "loss of the One" with respect to the severe human divisions and conflicts on this planet at this time. In many ways, this work encompasses the gestural definition of what The Zeitgeist Film Series is about, along with The Social Movement that was inspired from it."

Zeitgeist: Requiem for One | The Zeitgeist Media Festival 2011

Friday, September 16, 2011

CLASSICS: Ron Paul vs Alan Greenspan

Ron Paul questions Greenspan


1999-2004


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at monetary policy hearing (1999)


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at monetary policy hearing (2000)


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at Monetary Policy Hearing (2001)


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at monetary policy hearing (2002)


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at economic outlook hearing (2003)


Ron Paul questions Alan Greenspan at joint economic hearing (2004)


Bonus:

Ron Paul: "The Federal Reserve Bank of New York called an emergency meeting late last night" (1998)


Ron Paul: "Greenspan increased the money supply by $1.9 trillion or a 65% increase" (2001)

Daniel Hannan: This is the end

Daniel Hannan: This is the end

Crisis Worse Than 2008 in Europe as Rescue Options Dim, Gordon Brown Says


European banks are “grossly under- capitalized” and the debt crisis is more serious for the region than the 2008 meltdown as governments are constrained by fiscal pressures, former U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said.

“In 2008, governments could intervene to sort out the problems of banks,” Brown said at the World Economic Forum in the Chinese port city of Dalian today. “In 2011, banks have problems, but so too do governments.”

Investor skittishness over Europe’s sovereign debt crisis raised lenders’ funding costs and caused a rout in the region’s banking stocks this month. European Central Bank President Jean- Claude Trichet pressed euro-area governments late yesterday to take decisive action to restore confidence after the ECB extended an emergency lifeline to lenders.

Brown said that while the ECB is part of the short-term solution, it needs additional assistance.

The European Financial Stabilization Mechanism, which is run by the European Union’s 27-nation executive arm, is “not enough,” Brown said. “Substantially more resources” are required, including from the International Monetary Fund and lenders including China, he said.
‘Hour to Midnight’

“The euro area problem is now moving to the center,” Brown said. “The euro cannot survive in its present form, it’s going to have to be reformed dramatically. We are I think at an hour to midnight in the way that we look at this issue.”

Regulators should stick to their commitments to implement bank capital rules agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision irrespective of opposition from lenders, Trichet said yesterday at a forum in Wroclaw, Poland, including plans to require the biggest banks to hold up to 2.5 percentage points in extra reserves.

In a crisis period where confidence is of the essence, it would be extremely damaging if the authorities were to hesitate, demonstrate an absence of resolve and of the fortitude that is required by the circumstances,” Trichet said. “For me, it is crystal clear: what has been decided is decided.”

Britain’s government this week said it will force lenders to insulate their consumer banking units by 2019 as Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne seeks to shield customers and taxpayers from another financial crisis.

“European banks as a whole are grossly under- capitalized,” Brown said. “We’ve now got the interplay between banks that are not properly capitalized and sovereign debt problems that have arisen partly because we’ve socialized or accepted responsibility for the banks’ liabilities.”

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Crisis Worse Than 2008 in Europe as Rescue Options Dim, Gordon Brown Says

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Greenspan - Controlling Gov't Debt to Be Painful (13-Sept-11)

Greenspan - Controlling Gov't Debt to Be Painful (13-Sept-11)

Peter Schiff Testifies Before Congressional Jobs Committee

The Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs, Stimulus Oversight, and Government Spending held a hearing, which examined the results of the Administration's economic policies thus far and explored the proposals outlined by President Obama on Thursday, September 8, 2011.

Peter Schiff Testifies Before Congressional Jobs Committee Part 1


Peter Schiff Testifies Before Congressional Jobs Committee Part 2


Full:

"Take Two: The President's Proposal to Stimulate the Economy"

Peter Joseph on RT - Zeitgeist founder calls for a resource based system

Worldwide there are many issues that have arisen in the last few years. Many countries like Egypt and Libya have sought revolution due to the desire for change. Many think that society as a whole needs to be overhauled. One of those individuals is Peter Joseph, filmmaker and founder of the Zeitgeist Movement, and he is here to share his thoughts.

Zeitgeist founder calls for a resource based system

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

UK UPCOMING REVOLT - Unions to ballot on nationwide pension strikes

Britain is facing the threat of mass walkouts by public sector workers after the biggest unions announced strike ballots over pensions.

Unison, Unite, the GMB and the Fire Brigades' Union will consult members about co-ordinated industrial action starting in November.

Unison's leader Dave Prentis told the TUC's annual conference the strikes would involve the "fight of our lives".

But the government said widespread action would leave the public "angry".

Ministers are seeking increases in pension contributions from next April, while millions of workers continue to face a pay freeze.

The coalition argues that rises in payments are fair and will make schemes sustainable despite an ageing population.

'This is it'

Proposing a motion backing mass strikes to the TUC conference, Mr Prentis revealed he was giving 9,000 employers formal notice that his union's 1.1 million members would be balloted.

He said: "We've had enough. We've been patient, co-operative and we must say enough is enough."

"If we don't say it now, they [the government] will be back for more and more and more again.

"We will engage with them... but if they impose change by diktat, we will take industrial action."

He added: "It's the fight of our lives. I know it's an over-used cliché, but make no mistake, this is it."

Mr Prentis, who won a standing ovation from the 300 TUC delegates, was followed by series of other union representatives, who backed the action.

Gail Cartmail, assistant general secretary of Unite, said: "When the coalition came to power we knew we faced the fight of our lives. We knew they would seek to weaken and divide us.

"While we will never walk away from talks, neither can we sit on our hands. We will support days of action and tactical selective action."

The GMB's Brian Strutton said: "We're not talking about a day out and a bit of a protest. We're talking about something that's long and hard and dirty as well, because this is going to require days of action running through the winter, through into next year, following the government's legislative programme right into the summer."

Public and Commercial Services Union general secretary Mark Serwotka also supported action by "millions" of people, adding: "Marching together we can win."

Continue reading - BBC - Unions to ballot on nationwide pension strikes

Herman Daly | The End of Growth

"We Need A Crisis, And A Change of Values"


Herman Daly has advocated a steady-state-economy since the 1970s. Martin Eierman talked with him about the costs of growth, transformative politics and the dangers of academic determinism.

The European: You have worked for the World Bank for six years – an institution that has been described as spreading “the theology of the free market to the heathens”. Are you a non-believer?
Daly: I guess you can call me an apostate. When I went to work for the World Bank’s Environment Department, I looked at it this way: It is of no use preaching to the choir. You have to talk to the people you disagree with and be persuasive. At times we thought we were being persuasive. But eventually I came to believe that it was really a lost cause and mainly window dressing. By and large, people at the World Bank were no cynics but true believers in growth, and environmental protection was seen as an impediment to growth. They had all learned from the same teachers in the same elite universities and now preached the same doctrine. They had every reason to believe they were right – expect for two things: Common sense and real-world feedback. Some criticized the World Bank for failing to serve its goal to enable growth. Some thought that growth needed to be more widely shared. But the emphasis on growth was sincere and fundamental, so it was not questioned. I don’t expect anything good from the World Bank.

The European: Why should we question growth?
Daly: We are in a situation where growth has begun to cost more than it is worth. It has become uneconomical, at least in rich countries. In an empty world, growth is good. But that is not the world we inhabit. We live in a world that is full of us and our stuff, a world that is finite in terms of the economic activity it can sustain. We need to build the physical constraints of a finite biophysical environment into our economic theory.

The European: Let us start with economic theory on the level of the individual. Has the ideology of the homo oeconomicus outlived the model upon which it was originally based? People concede that Smith or Hayek were partially mistaken, yet their credo is very much alive.

Daly: I would add one more aspect: Their ontological picture of man is flawed. Instead of conceiving of human beings as atomistic independent individuals that are connected through the nexus of the market and keen to maximize their own benefit and pleasure, we should really think of man as being constituted by the relationships with others. We are not only externally related to others, we are internally related to them as well. When you ask me: ‘Who are you?’ I would define myself as a husband, son, father, citizen, friend, or member. And in a more physical sense, I would be an air-breather and a water-drinker and a food-eater. The quality of these relationships by which we are constituted determines our welfare far more than the amount of commodities we consume. Economists nod at that criticism of their model and then just go back to doing what they have always been doing.

The European: Are you not constructing a straw man? There have been many attempts at updating the classical homo oeconomicus model over the years, economics has broadened its gaze and turned more towards sociology or politics.
Daly: Sure, there is behavioral economics and environmental economics and experimental economics. I just don’t think that they are having an effect. The evidence I would give is from introductory textbooks. Don’t show me the latest article in a specialized journal. Show me the fundamental textbook you teach in the first course, where students are supposed to learn the very basics of economics. Is it in there? There might be a paragraph on the environment somewhere as an addendum to chapter 36. But environmental problems, they say, can be easily solved by getting prices “right”.

The European: Is economics suffering from a case of path dependence, where the structures and norms that were once set up dominate the discourse long after they should have been questioned?
Daly: I would go even further than that. What is a polite word for “brain dead”? Actually there are very smart people among economists, but they are all operating within the basic paradigm. It used to be that academic disciplines interacted at the university, and that philosophy was the critic of the disciplines. Now it is considered bad form to engage in interdisciplinary criticism, we have too much respect for each other. None of the other disciplines have the courage to challenge the fundamental presupposition of economics: that growth is the solution to all our problems.

The European: Is the financial crisis an opportunity to change that discourse?
Daly: The fundamental presuppositions are not really changing. We are accumulating more and more debt to finance economic growth, and we need more future growth to repay the debt. When growth does not happen, things fall apart. Look at the financial sector: When it is hard to grow in physical terms, it becomes more appealing to grow in symbolic terms. Forty percent of US economic profits are now in the financial sector. That is a huge drain on the rest of the economy.

Continue reading - Herman Daly | The End of Growth

Resource Based Economy vs. Libertarianism

Wars, protests, revolutions - the ball is rolling toward global collapse of the system that has prevailed since the end of World War II. The elite have a plan to replace it - their "solution" - but the true solutions will arise from the informed public, those with tempered demeanors and careful diction. Two such solutions are discussed here - John Bush, director of Texans for Accountable Government (http://www.tagtexas.org), is in the Libertarian corner, while Douglas Mallette, coordinator for the Zeitgeist Movement Technology Team (http://www.zeitnews.org), flexes the Resource Based Economy (RBE) model - both of which manage the delicate balance of intelligence and compassion that the ideas of most world "leaders" presently lack.

Ever wanted to see a discussion between Jacque Fresco and Ludwig von Mises? We sure have, but, until that happens, we like to think of this as the next best thing. :)

Resource Based Economy vs. Libertarianism

Nasar: How to Prevent Economic Crises


Unlike the movies, life rarely permits second takes. But the Second World War gave John Maynard Keynes, the patron saint of government activism, and Friedrich Hayek, the Cassandra who warned of the state’s destructive potential, just such opportunities.

During the Blitz, this odd couple was said to have shared fire-warden duty atop the soaring roof of Kings College’s chapel, an apogee of Gothic architecture that stood in the crosshairs of Nazi bombers. The story is likely apocryphal but its symbolism holds true. Despite their differences, both men were committed to the defense of Western civilization, and both were determined that the West would do better than it had last time in laying the foundations of a lasting peace.

When Hitler launched his mad world conquest, Keynes was no longer the slim young civil servant he had been 20 years earlier, someone who could poke fun at his superiors but was too remote from power to persuade them. Middle-aged and paunchy now, saddled with a “wonky” heart, he had become Britain’s de facto wartime treasurer and postwar planner and was in a position to influence the economic future.

Bretton Woods

In July 1944, 10 months before Germany’s surrender and 15 before Japan’s, Keynes was in a resort in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. The purpose of the Bretton Woods conference was to revive world trade when the war ended, stabilize currencies and deal with war debts and frozen credit markets. The war would leave much of the world significantly poorer, and countries would need to be able to earn their way back to prosperity. In the broadest sense, salvage meant rebuilding and reconstruction, moving back toward pre-1913 globalization, but without reviving the pre-World War I assumption that the world’s economic machinery worked automatically.

For the West, Bretton Woods meant avoiding the mistakes of the interwar era -- the very lesson that Marxists claimed capitalists could never learn -- and restoring lost moral and material credibility. Economic chaos after World War I had convinced Keynes that economic stability was a key to political stability, and economic growth was a necessary if not sufficient condition for the long-run survival of the West. Modern societies could not endure economic breakdowns any more than great cities could run without electricity or water.

By 1943, it was obvious to Keynes that the U.S. and Britain would design the postwar economic order together, but that America’s financial strength and Britain’s weakness meant that the U.S. would have the last word on all important matters. Determined to deploy his intellectual capital as a counterweight to American financial clout, he drafted the British proposal and got it out first.

International Monetary Fund

Keynes envisioned a United Nations of international finance that would provide a framework for cooperation as global lender of last resort and arbiter of trade disputes. It would operate according to agreed-upon rules and procedures to avert financial crises, trade wars and depressions such as those in the interwar era. By marshalling international cooperation to deal with postwar debts and stabilize currencies, the West would not be driven, as it had been between the wars, to embrace the beggar- thy-neighbor policies that had exacerbated the Great Depression. On the sea journey to the U.S., Keynes drew up blueprints for the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Unlike British thinkers in the Victorian era who championed free trade, Keynes and his American counterpart, Harry Dexter White, the U.S. Treasury’s second in command (and a KGB agent), no longer believed that the world naturally tends toward peace and progress. International cooperation was required. The alternative was unthinkable.

Allied political leaders had also learned from experience that peace depended on economic revival. As President Franklin Roosevelt put it, “Economic diseases are highly communicable. It follows therefore that the economic health of every country is a proper matter of concern to all its neighbors, near and distant.”

The Bretton Woods conference was Keynes’s idea, but White chose the Mount Washington Hotel. When the conference got under way with delegates from 44 countries, Keynes and White were in charge. Keynes took little trouble to disguise the fact that he was ramming his views down the throats of the banking committee that he chaired. The U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau had to go around to Keynes’s suite and ask him to “please go slow and talk louder and have his papers in better arrangement.”

Keynes, typically, was more efficient than democratic. He had accomplished what he had wished to accomplish as a much younger man, and now he was exhausted and eager to get away. When he arrived at the banquet to give the final speech, everyone stood up, silently, until he made his way to the dais.

Continue reading - Bloomberg - Nasar: How to Prevent Economic Crises

Ron Paul Subcommittee - Road Map to Sound Money: A Legislative Hearing on H.R. 1098 and Restoring the Dollar.

On Tuesday afternoon, Chairman Ron Paul held the eighth hearing of the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, entitled: “Road Map to Sound Money: A Legislative Hearing on H.R. 1098 and Restoring the Dollar.” The two expert witnesses were Dr. Lawrence M. Parks (Executive Director, Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education) and Dr. Lawrence H. White (Professor of Economics, George Mason University)

Ron Paul's Statement
Lawrence H. White's Statement

Ron Paul Subcommittee - Restoring Sound Money Tuesday, September 13